Now that April is here and you begin to think about plans for Spring Break or for the summer, you may run into the age-old question of how to get from Point A to Point B.
Should you drive? Or should you fly?
First of all, everything is more expensive. Gas is approaching the $4-a-gallon threshold, and airlines have issued a half-dozen fare increases this year. But you should also consider some other factors in your decision of choosing one transportation method over another.
- Your distance. How far are you traveling? Where are the airports compared to your origin and destination? I once lived about three hours from the nearest airport. Needless to say, I drove almost everywhere I went, unless it was out of state. Also, would your routing take you out of the way one way or another? Flying from Miami to New Orleans is more direct than having to drive (because you cut across the Gulf of Mexico), but flying from El Paso to Oklahoma City may require you to transfer in Houston, further extending your trip.
- Your time. A good rule of thumb is that for trips of less than 300 miles – or maybe even 400 miles – flying is, overall, no faster than driving. When you leave on a road trip, you pack up your car and go. When you fly, you have to pack carefully (for example, no liquids in carry-ons), travel to the airport, stand in lines, go through security, wait to board, risk weather or mechanical delays, risk lost luggage, wait to de-board, and stand in line for transportation to lodging. But, you don’t want to waste two days of your five-day vacation traveling if you really want to maximize your time in Disneyland, no matter the cost.
- Your party size. How many people will travel with you? Are kids involved? Generally, when more than two are traveling together, it becomes cheaper to drive because you gain efficiencies on the transportation. It does not cost a lot more to squeeze one extra person in the car, compared to having to pay for extra tickets. Also, kids become an added hassle to have to manage at an airport, and there’s no pulling over in the middle of a flight to teach the kids a lesson – “If you two don’t stop fighting, I’ll pull this car over!.”
- Your baggage. It’s not just about buying a ticket from Point A to Point B. Almost every airline charges for checked baggage, and there are limitations to what you can bring with your carry-on luggage. Factor that into your cost. And, even if you don’t mind checking in your gear, there’s the risk that your baggage may not make it to Point B when you need it to.
- How long will you be away? The longer you are away, the more likely you would need to take more stuff with you. For example, before laptops and internet cafes were popular, I had to drag a desktop with me when I went on a work-related one-month trip. I decided that I’d drive, and I took a lot more clothes and personal amenities than I would have if I had flown.
- Will you need a car? You may be able to live with cabs and public transit for a few days, but would not having a car be a major inconvenience? Depends on where you’re going, and whether your stay involves a major holiday or a weekend, where public transportation is often not as frequent or reliable. If you’re going to rent a car at your destination anyway, would driving from home (consider time, party size, cost, location of airports) be better?
- The experience. They say that “getting there” is half the fun. Maybe. Driving may take you through a more scenic route, provide more flexibility for you, and allow you to tack on additional purposes like an errand or a stopover at an en route attraction. But are you traveling with people you want to be locked in a car with? How relaxing would it be if you were stuck in bumper-to-bumper traffic on your way from Washington, D.C., to New York City? This is a “cost” that only you could assess, and depending on the time you had at your vacation spot, the experience could change between getting there and getting back.
- The environment. Yes, because Earth Day is coming up, and because people are more environmentally conscious these days, I thought we’d assess your trip’s cost to Mother Nature. While this may not cost you in terms of money, some may take environmental impact into consideration when they make this decision. But measuring this is not simple, due to number of variables that include number of travelers and size of car or airplane, because some are more efficient than others. According to the EcoPassenger website, a Paris-to-Frankfurt flight will emit 92.7 kilograms of carbon dioxide, the leading greenhouse gas, per passenger. The same trip by train will cost 16.4 kilograms, and a medium-size car carrying one person will cause 110 kilograms. The same trip for five people are 84.4, 16.4, and 22 kilograms of carbon dioxide per person. However, determining environmental cost with different modes of transportation is tricky, since we never really compare apples to apples, and you have to consider that regardless of whether a plane is full or half-full, it will make that flight.
Well, we all have our priorities. The bottom line is that it’s not just about the dollar bottom line. What else do you think about in deciding whether to fly or drive?
- Helpful Traveler Tony




